We have been struggling to get support and answeres regarding this roadblock : Request in whitelisting of the NFC Tag Reading and Writing (NDEF) entitlement for our iOS application Our application utilizes Core NFC to enable reading and writing of NFC tags, simplifying user interactions with NFC-enabled devices and services. The NDEF entitlement is essential for our app to deliver its core functionality effectively. Build Environment: Our app is developed and built using Xcode 16.4 on Codemagic’s cloud-based CI/CD platform, which utilizes a compatible macOS version (e.g., macOS Sonoma 14.4 or later). The app targets iOS 18 and uses Core NFC APIs for NDEF tag reading and writing. so far we cant get it to read or write as ios is restricking us

My App supports two services that is Push Notification for Alerts and a Voip Call feature whose notification also comes in the same way as of PushNotification but video rendering is done with GoogleWebRTC. The App was working perfectly fine but from past few months these services are not working.[ Nothing is changed in App and on the server side to push the notifications] Issues: VoIP (Video call) not working: I have apns certificate which is valid in today's date and stays with the backend Server. My server sends the payload notification to APNS but on iPhone am unable to receive it. I have checked the App registration part also and is able to receive the token for the same. Framework used are: PushKit, UserNotifications, GoogleWebRTC . I don't understand where is the gap, the backend triggers the APNS but there no response. Ports enabled on server are: 443, 5223, 2197, 2195, 2196. Similarly Push notification were also not working, So I tried to change it to register on Firebase for device registration token And did some coding at backend to send the notification to that device. It was working perfectly fine from last few weeks, but it suddenly stopped. I checked the JSON Payload and tried to send it through PostMan, in both it says 200 Success. And in Application end am waiting for breakpoint to hit in userNotificationCenter(_: , willPresent, completionHandler). What all I have checked: 1)My server to APNS server connectivity. 2)Verified the apns certificate. The certificate was created in October 2024, whose expiry is in Nov 2025 and it support both Sandbox and Production environment. 3)Checked required delegates are implemented in App. With the capability enable in it, is also sending registration token to backend. Kindly guide me where I can check in this flow. Thanks in Advance!

Hi, I'm getting a very odd error log in my SwiftData setup for an iOS app. It is implemented to support schema migration. When starting the app, it simply prints the following log twice (seems to be dependent on how many migration steps, I have two steps in my sample code): CoreData: error: Attempting to retrieve an NSManagedObjectModel version checksum while the model is still editable. This may result in an unstable verison checksum. Add model to NSPersistentStoreCoordinator and try again. (Yes there is a mistyped word "verison", this is exactly the log) The code actually fully works. But I have neither CloudKit configured, nor is this app in Production yet. I'm still just developing. Here is the setup and code to reproduce the issue. Development mac version: macOS 15.5 XCode version: 16.4 iOS Simulator version: 18.5 Real iPhone version: 18.5 Project name: SwiftDataDebugApp SwiftDataDebugApp.swift: import SwiftUI import SwiftData @main struct SwiftDataDebugApp: App { var sharedModelContainer: ModelContainer = { let schema = Schema([ Item.self, ]) let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: false, allowsSave: true) do { return try ModelContainer(for: schema, migrationPlan: ModelMigraitonPlan.self, configurations: [modelConfiguration]) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } }() var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } .modelContainer(sharedModelContainer) } } Item.swift: import Foundation import SwiftData typealias Item = ModelSchemaV2_0_0.Item enum ModelSchemaV1_0_0: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Item.self] } @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } } enum ModelSchemaV2_0_0: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(2, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Item.self] } @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date var tags: [Tag] = [] init(timestamp: Date, tags: [Tag]) { self.timestamp = timestamp self.tags = tags } } } enum ModelMigraitonPlan: SchemaMigrationPlan { static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] { [ModelSchemaV1_0_0.self] } static var stages: [MigrationStage] { [migrationV1_0_0toV2_0_0] } static let migrationV1_0_0toV2_0_0 = MigrationStage.custom( fromVersion: ModelSchemaV1_0_0.self, toVersion: ModelSchemaV2_0_0.self, willMigrate: nil, didMigrate: { context in let items = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<ModelSchemaV2_0_0.Item>()) for item in items { item.tags = Array(repeating: "abc", count: Int.random(in: 0...3)).map({ Tag(value: $0) }) } try context.save() } ) } Tag.swift: import Foundation struct Tag: Codable, Hashable, Comparable { var value: String init(value: String) { self.value = value } static func < (lhs: Tag, rhs: Tag) -> Bool { return lhs.value < rhs.value } static func == (lhs: Tag, rhs: Tag) -> Bool { return lhs.value == rhs.value } func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) { hasher.combine(value) } } ContentView.swift: import SwiftUI import SwiftData struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query private var items: [Item] var body: some View { VStack { List { ForEach(items) { item in VStack(alignment: .leading) { Text(item.timestamp, format: Date.FormatStyle(date: .numeric, time: .standard)) HStack { ForEach(item.tags, id: \.hashValue) { tag in Text("\(tag.value)") } } } } .onDelete(perform: deleteItems) } Button("Add") { addItem() } .padding(.top) } } private func addItem() { withAnimation { let newItem = Item(timestamp: Date(), tags: [Tag(value: "Hi")]) modelContext.insert(newItem) } do { try modelContext.save() } catch { print("Error saving add: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } private func deleteItems(offsets: IndexSet) { withAnimation { for index in offsets { modelContext.delete(items[index]) } } do { try modelContext.save() } catch { print("Error saving delete: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } } #Preview { ContentView() .modelContainer(for: Item.self, inMemory: true) } I hope someone can help, couldn't find anything related to this log at all.

We're interested in adopting App Sandbox in an app distributed outside of the Mac App Store. However, we're hitting a bit of a roadblock and it doesn't seem like either of the techniques described in that post can be used in a reasonable way. For background, this is a third-party launcher for a cross-platform Java game that, among other things, makes it easier for users to mod the game. Users generally download mods as .jar files and place them in a certain directory. In some cases, these mods contain native dynamic libraries (e.g. a .dylib) as part of their code. In general, the .dylib is extracted from the contents of the .jar to some temporary location, loaded, and then deleted once the game closes (the exact details, like the actual temporary location, depends on the mod). App Sandbox greatly interests us in this case because it can limit the damage that a compromised mod could do, and in my testing the functionality of most mods still works with it enabled. However, sandboxed apps quarantine every file they write to by default. Unfortunately, most mods are created by individual developers who don't notarize their libraries (their mods are generally cross-platform, and they're likely just using third-party code that they bundle with the mod but don't sign or notarize). [1] This means that a mod that loads a dynamic library as described above triggers Gatekeeper as described in the documentation if the app is sandboxed, but does not if the sandbox is disabled. Even worse, a user often can't bypass the warning even if they trust the mod because the extracted library is usually a temporary file, and generally is deleted after the failure (which usually causes the game to crash and thus close). By the time they try to approve the code in System Settings, the file is gone (and even if they could approve it, this approval wouldn't stick next time they launch the game). In theory it would work to use an unsandboxed XPC service to remove the quarantine and let the libraries through. However, this is easier said than done. We don't control the mods' code or how they go about loading whatever code they need, which limits what we can do. [1] And in some cases, people like to play old versions of the game with old mods, and the versions they're using might've been released before notarization was even a thing. The closest thing I can think of to a solution is injecting code into the Java process that runs code to call out to the XPC service to remove the quarantine before a library loads (e.g. before any calls to dlopen using dyld interposition). A prototype I have... works... but this seems really flimsy, I've read that interposition isn't meant to be used in non-dev tools, and if there's a better solution I'd certainly prefer that over this. Other things we've tried have significant downsides: com.apple.security.files.user-selected.executable requires user selection in a file picker, and seems to be more blunt than just allowing libraries/plugins which might lead to a sandbox escape [2] Adding the app to the "Developer Tools" section in System Settings > Privacy & Security allows the libraries to load automatically, but requires users to add the app manually and also sounds like it would make a sandbox escape very easy [2] Oh, and I also submitted an enhancement request for an entitlement/similar that would allow these libraries to load (FB13795828) but it was returned as "no plans to address" (which honestly wasn't that surprising). [2] My understanding is that if a sandboxed process loads libraries, the library code would still be confined by the sandbox because it's still running in the sandboxed process. But if a sandboxed process can write and open a non-quarantined app, that app would not be within the confines of the sandbox. So basically we want to somehow allow the libraries to load but not allow standalone executables to run outside the sandbox. In general the game and almost all popular mods I've tested work with App Sandbox enabled, except for this Gatekeeper snag. It would be a shame to completely abandon App Sandbox for this reason if everything else can be made to work. This situation seems not super common, but documentation does say When your sandboxed app launches for the first time, macOS creates a sandbox container on the file system (in ~/Library/Containers) and associates it with your app. Your app has full read and write access to its sandbox container, and can run programs located there as well. which leaves me wondering whether the Gatekeeper prompt is even intended behavior since the libraries are in the sandbox container and written by the app. (By the way, my testing of the claim that apps can run programs in their sandbox container didn't seem to confirm what the documentation said, even without quarantine - FB15963761). Though, given the other documentation page I linked above which more directly references Gatekeeper and quarantined plug-ins, I doubt this is a bug. I suppose the final question is, is this just a situation where App Sandbox won't work (at least in any supported way)? Or is there perhaps some technique we're missing?

Hey everyone, We're looking for the best way to handle App Store Server Notifications in our development setup and would appreciate some guidance. Our Setup: We use a single App Store Connect account for development, which supports multiple environments (e.g., staging1, staging2). Our production app lives in a separate account, so that's not an issue. The Challenge: We have only one configurable sandbox notification URL. This makes it difficult to route notifications to the correct development server (staging1 vs. staging2 vs developments) when a sandbox event occurs. We're considering using a proxy server to catch all notifications and then forward them to the appropriate environment. However, we're not sure how to determine the correct destination. Our Questions: What's the recommended approach for managing a single sandbox notification URL across multiple development environments? If a proxy is the best method, which parameter in the responseBodyV2 payload should we use to route the notification? How can we differentiate between our various dev environments? Is it possible to add custom properties to the App Store Server Notification V2 body to facilitate routing? Any advice or best practices you've implemented would be greatly appreciated.

is it possible for the IOS 26 to make the chat bubbles different colors than blue? kinda tired of the same blue color. is it possible to get that version for the new update?

I haven’t come across any official documentation regarding the limit on the number of Network Extensions macOS can run. However, I did see some discussions suggesting that Apple might restrict this to 5 extensions in macOS Tahoe. Is there any official confirmation on this?

Looking for help with our Apple HealthKit integration. We've successfully pulled steps, distance, active energy, glucose and heart rate. However, the data pulled for sleep duration is incorrect. Not sure what we're doing wrong.

Hi, We're experiencing an issue with verifying our domain for Apple Pay on the web. It's currently stuck in the "Pending" state despite meeting the listed requirements. The domain in question has been verified once successfully but one month later when we renewed the SSL, we were unable to verify the domain again. Please note that the new certificate's CA chain has been changed. A) The "apple-developer-merchantid-domain-association.txt" file is publicly accessible at the following location: /.well-known/apple-developer-merchantid-domain-association.txt B) We've also ensured that the following IP ranges are whitelisted: 17.32.139.128/27 17.32.139.160/27 17.140.126.0/27 17.140.126.32/27 17.179.144.128/27 17.179.144.160/27 17.179.144.192/27 17.179.144.224/27 17.253.0.0/16 17.23.4.96/27 17.132.108.64/26 17.23.24.32/27 17.23.19.0/27 17.157.40.128/27 17.157.44.128/27 17.157.32.0/27 C) Our servers support TLS 1.2 already. D) "ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256" cipher suite has been used, so we believe all necessary criteria are satisfied. However, when we attempt to verify the domain, we receive the following error message: "Domain verification failed. Review your TLS Certificate configuration to confirm that the certificate is accessible and a supported TLS Cipher Suite is used." Could you please advise why the verification is failing, or let us know if there's anything we might have missed? Best regards, Mehdi

Consider the following in an AppIntent: struct TestIntent: AppIntent { static let title: LocalizedStringResource = "Test Intent" static var parameterSummary: some ParameterSummary { Summary("Test") { \.$options } } enum Option: Int, CaseIterable, AppEnum { case one case two case three case four case five case six static let typeDisplayRepresentation: TypeDisplayRepresentation = TypeDisplayRepresentation( name: "Options" ) static let caseDisplayRepresentations: [Option: DisplayRepresentation] = [ .one: DisplayRepresentation(title: "One"), .two: DisplayRepresentation(title: "Two"), .three: DisplayRepresentation(title: "Three"), .four: DisplayRepresentation(title: "Four"), .five: DisplayRepresentation(title: "Five"), .six: DisplayRepresentation(title: "Six"), ] } @Parameter(title: "Options", default: []) var options: [Option] @MainActor func perform() async throws -> some IntentResult { print(options) return .result() } } In Shortcuts, this will turn into a dropdown where you can check multiple Option values. However, when perform() is called, options will be an empty array regardless of what the user selects. This is observed on both iOS 18.5 and macOS 15.5. However, on iOS 26.0 beta and macOS 26.0 beta, the issue seems to be resolved and options contains all the checked options. However, we do back deploy to current/previous iOS/macOS versions. How can we provide a multiple choice selection of fixed values on these older versions?

Hi there, I am in the process of writing a macOS app using NSFileProviderExtension so that I can map my customer's data in Finder. I am in the process of building it out. But one thing I notice is that once the file is downloaded and I save it to the cache folder, I see it disappear from the folder. It looks like the system removed the downloaded file a few seconds later. How do I go about tracking this? I have added the log stream messages from the point where it is downloaded to the point where it is gone missing. Any pointers greatly appreciated. 2025-07-15 16:10:41.989915-0700 0x138326 Default 0x0 989 0 filecoordinationd: (Foundation) [com.apple.foundation.filecoordination:provider] Provider radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension finished providing for 44FB3A4A-CA50-4EE2-9DC8-1C96FE584DF5 2025-07-15 16:10:41.989974-0700 0x138326 Default 0x0 989 0 filecoordinationd: (Foundation) [com.apple.foundation.filecoordination:claims] Provider radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension finished, unblocking claimer for 44FB3A4A-CA50-4EE2-9DC8-1C96FE584DF5 2025-07-15 16:10:41.987613-0700 0x138bb6 Default 0x0 990 0 fileproviderd: (Foundation) [com.apple.foundation.filecoordination:provider] radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension finished providing 2025-07-15 16:10:42.034144-0700 0x138905 Default 0x71f4b8 624 7 runningboardd: (RunningBoard) [com.apple.runningboard:ttl] Invalidating assertion 624-44341-46806 (target:[xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:5AABEA5E-ACAD-428B-A6DD-F2EFF14CEE99]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}:44341]) from originator [xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:5AABEA5E-ACAD-428B-A6DD-F2EFF14CEE99]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}:44341] 2025-07-15 16:10:44.185866-0700 0x138906 Default 0x0 624 7 runningboardd: (RunningBoard) [com.apple.runningboard:ttl] [xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:B08DACEF-EDCC-4DE9-91AA-DC26EDB2FA89]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}:44328] termination reported by launchd (0, 0, 0) 2025-07-15 16:10:44.186166-0700 0x138906 Default 0x0 624 0 runningboardd: (RunningBoard) [com.apple.runningboard:process] Removing process: [xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:B08DACEF-EDCC-4DE9-91AA-DC26EDB2FA89]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}:44328] 2025-07-15 16:10:44.186424-0700 0x138906 Default 0x0 624 0 runningboardd: (RunningBoard) [com.apple.runningboard:process] Removing assertions for terminated process: [xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:B08DACEF-EDCC-4DE9-91AA-DC26EDB2FA89]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}:44328] 2025-07-15 16:10:44.189939-0700 0x138c30 Default 0x71f4e4 976 0 gamepolicyd: (RunningBoardServices) [com.apple.runningboard:monitor] Received state update for 44328 (xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:B08DACEF-EDCC-4DE9-91AA-DC26EDB2FA89]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}, none-NotVisible 2025-07-15 16:10:44.190503-0700 0x138c8f Default 0x0 624 0 runningboardd: (RunningBoard) [com.apple.runningboard:process] XPC connection invalidated: [xpcservice<radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension([osservice<com.apple.FileProvider(501)>:990])(501)>{vt hash: 247410607}[uuid:B08DACEF-EDCC-4DE9-91AA-DC26EDB2FA89]{persona:9EF54117-4998-4D72-83C4-F12587C95FBA}:44328] 2025-07-15 16:10:46.294619-0700 0x13904a Default 0x0 44341 0 DriveFileProviderExtension: 🔥FileProviderExtension: 🔥FileProviderExtension: ❌ CRITICAL: File disappeared after 5 seconds! /Users/radwar/Library/Containers/radwar.Drive.DriveFileProviderExtension/Data/Library/Caches/FileCache/README.md (item: 19105790787)```

I have been trying to use TipKit popovers in my App. They all behave as expected in the simulator but on a real device I am seeing some strange behaviors. I have a couple of instances of where the tip is displaying an entire sheet instead of just the popover. In another case I cannot dismiss the Tip. Has anyone seen these behaviors and are there known issues/workarounds for this? I am reluctant to use something that works perfectly in the simulator but gives unpredictable results on a device. Not a good user experience in my opinion.

I recently started a new app that supports universal links. I noticed an error in the apple-app-site-association (AASA) file and updated it. I used mode=developer in the applinks configuration, and it works well on Simulator, but for the life of me I can't get my device to load the new file, and the CDN hasn't updated in days. Any suggestions for how to get it to update, or get iOS to load the file directly? mode=developer is supposed to do this, but it simply won't on device. I've tried touching the file, and I can see its reported HTTP last modification date and eTag have changed. I've tried deleting and reinstalling the app; I've tried restarting the phone; I've tried clean builds; I've tried changing the applinks: to something else and reinstalling; I've tried installing via TestFlight.

I'm trying to set a boolean value to myVariable using the "Folder" property, but the Applescript editor keeps interpreting it as a class. Here is a shorted code. this is part of a bigger code to identify files dropped into a folder and create a new folder which it renames based on the date of the file that is dropped into the folder. Unfortunately, it keeps making folders every time it makes a new folder. Resalting in continuous loop of folders being created and renamed to "2025". The plan is to us an IF condition to prevent the creation of folders when a folder/s are dropped into my folder with my Folder Action. property directory : "Catalina:Users:Username:Desktop:Folder:File.pdf tell application "Finder" set pathname to POSIX path of directory set item_info to the info for directory set myVariable to Folder of item_info return myVariable end tell I noticed the following when I compile the script The color of the "Folder" is blue. I believe this means it's a class. Normally when I call a property, the color turns pink. it does it correctly when I use "set the file_name to the "name" of this_file". I also tried declaring the "Folder" property in brackets "Folder". did not help I noticed the following when I run the script: It returns ---error number -10004 "A privilege violation occurred. When it runs the "info for" command. I gave the Script Editor Full File access, Full Accessibility access and the FolderActionsDispatcher has full Finder access. Can anyone point me in the right direction! What is the cause of the privilege violation or how would I find what the cause is? How do I force the Script Editor to get the "Folder" property of a folder?

It seems that beta 3 broke StoreKit Testing when running against an iOS 26 simulator device. Specifically, when validating product IDs, the debug console displays messages like the following: [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) [492a4cfa_SK1] Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.price], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) In addition, the SKProductsResponse (I am using the original StoreKit API), lists all requested product IDs in invalidProductIdentifiers. The products array is empty. StoreKit Testing behaves as expected when Xcode 26 beta 3 is run against an iOS 18.4 simulator device.

We are developing an iOS application that is interacting with HTTP APIs that requires us to put a unique UUID (a nonce) as an header on every request (obviously there's more than that, but that's irrilevant to the question here). If the same nonce is sent on two subsequent requests the server returns a 412 error. We should avoid generating this kind of errors as, if repeated, they may be flagged as a malicious activity by the HTTP APIs. We are using URLSession.shared.dataTaskPublisher(for: request) to call the HTTP APIs with request being generated with the unique nonce as an header. On our field tests we are seeing a few cases of the same HTTP request (same nonce) being repeated a few seconds on after the other. Our code has some retry logic only on 401 errors, but that involves a token refresh, and this is not what we are seeing from logs. We were able to replicate this behaviour on our own device using Network Link Conditioner with very bad performance, with XCode's Network inspector attached we can be certain that two HTTP requests with identical headers are actually made automatically, the first request has an "End Reason" of "Retry", the second is "Success" with Status 412. Our questions are: can we disable this behaviour? can we provide a new request for the retry (so that we can update headers)? Thanks, Francesco

My back camera freezes after first frame is displayed on the screen. Issue is present in all the apps that use the back camera. Same issue with front camera, however front camera works with Facetime and WhatsApp but not the native camera app.

Hello, We’re developing a loyalty program using Apple Wallet passes, and everything works except the silent push update flow. Context PassTypeIdentifier: pass.order.com.lealtad.xxxx Device is physical (not simulator) Pass is installed and visible in Wallet Correct pushToken is stored in our backend Push response from APNs: StatusCode: 200 OK apns-id: DBFF9693-D053-AA20-D737-3B24414105F3 WebServiceURL is reachable: https://xxxxx.net GET /passes/{passTypeIdentifier}/{serialNumber} endpoint is implemented and logs all calls No call is received from Apple to GET /passes/... after the push .pkpass is signed and installs correctly push payload json Copiar Editar { "aps": { "content-available": 1 }, "serialNumbers": ["9a4c9376d4"], "updated": true } pass.json json Copiar Editar { "formatVersion": 1, "passTypeIdentifier": "pass.order.com.lealtad.xxxxx", "teamIdentifier": "xxxxxxxx", "serialNumber": "9a4c9376d4xxxxxx", "webServiceURL": "https://xxxxxx.net", "authenticationToken": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", ... } We have verified: Pass is installed and contains the correct authentication token. Pass registration via POST /devices/... happens and is logged. Push notifications are sent successfully and received (APNs 200 OK). Our endpoint GET /passes/... responds properly with Authorization: Bearer {{token}}. Certificate used to send the push is the same type as the one used to sign the .pkpass. What could cause Apple Wallet to ignore the push? We would appreciate guidance on what might be preventing Wallet from calling the webServiceURL after a valid push. Is there a way to trace why Apple is not triggering the request? Thanks in advance for your help. Best regards, José Ruiz

Hi everyone, I'm currently experimenting with building a simple DNS filter using Apple's Packet Tunnel framework. Here's the flow I'm trying to implement: Create a TUN interface Set up a UDP socket Read packets via packetFlow.readPackets Parse the raw IP packet Forward the UDP payload through the socket Receive the response from the server Reconstruct the IP packet with the response Write it back to the TUN interface using packetFlow.writePackets Here’s an example of an intercepted IP packet (DNS request): 45 00 00 3c 15 c4 00 00 40 11 93 d1 c0 a8 00 64 08 08 08 08 ed 6e 00 35 00 28 e5 c9 7f da 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 74 69 6d 65 05 61 70 70 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 And here’s the IP packet I tried writing back into the TUN interface (DNS response): 45 00 00 89 5e 37 40 00 40 11 0b 11 08 08 08 08 c0 a8 00 64 00 35 ed 6e 00 75 91 e8 7f da 81 80 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 00 04 74 69 6d 65 05 61 70 70 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 0c fb 00 11 04 74 69 6d 65 01 67 07 61 61 70 6c 69 6d 67 c0 17 c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 74 fd c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 74 7d c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 54 fb Unfortunately, it seems the packet is not being written back correctly to the TUN interface. I'm not seeing any expected DNS response behavior on the device. Also, I noticed that after creating the TUN, the interface address shows up as 0.0.0.0:0 in Xcode. The system log includes this message when connecting the VPN: NWPath does not have valid interface: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: utun20[endc_sub6], ipv4, dns, expensive, uses cellular Does anyone know how to properly initialize the TUN so that the system recognizes it with a valid IP configuration? Or why my written-back packet might be getting ignored? Any help would be appreciated!

Hello, I have a question regarding the behavior of BGProcessingTaskRequest when the app is force-quit by the user via the App Switcher. Based on common understanding and various discussions — including the following Apple Developer Forum threads: Waking up an iOS app after app is … | Apple Developer Forums Will BGAppRefreshTaskRequest will … | Apple Developer Forums Background fetch after app is forc… | Apple Developer Forums …it is widely understood that iOS prevents background execution (such as background fetch, push notifications, or BGTaskScheduler) after a user force-quits an app via the App Switcher. However, in my app, I have observed that a scheduled BGProcessingTaskRequest still executes even after the app has been explicitly terminated via App Switcher. The task is scheduled using submit(_:error:), and it is clearly running some time after the app has been closed by the user. That said, the task does run, but it appears to operate under tighter constraints — for example, it may be allowed to run for a shorter duration, and network requests appear to be more restricted compared to when the app is not force-quit. My questions are: Are there any documented or undocumented exceptions that allow this kind of behavior after force-quit? Could this be a bug or a behavior change in recent iOS versions? (I am observing this on iOS 18.3, 18.4, and 18.5) Any insights, experiences, or clarifications from Apple engineers or fellow developers would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!